The International Journal of INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACY, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Summer 2009)
The pink revolution in Iran and the “Left”, Takis Fotopoulos
Introduction
It is obvious today that the huge propaganda campaign that was launched about four years ago by the transnational elite1 (roughly, the “G7”) and the Zionists, as well as by the international mass media controlled by them, to discredit and destabilise the Iranian Islamic regime, as a first step towards regime change, either from within or from without, has entered a new critical stage. As I will try to show in this brief book, this campaign is of enormous importance to the elites, and the system of the internationalised market economy and representative “democracy” as a whole, given that the establishment of a client regime in Iran will change not only the entire map of the Middle East and beyond, but would also open wide the road to impose the New World Order, from Latin America to North Korea. It is, therefore, utterly important to examine systematically the recent events in Iran and show the role of the reformist Left in supporting this campaign, directly or indirectly.
However, the fact that today the duty of the antisystemic Left (to differentiate it from the “anticapitalist” Left only in its rhetoric, whereas in reality it never questions explicitly the system of capitalist market economy and representative “democracy”) is to fully support the fundamentalists of the Islamic revolution in their fight against the transnational elite and its acolytes does not imply that we have to support uncritically this regime. This is surely an irrational theocratic regime and its struggle against the transnational elite and the New World Order focuses on the cultural aspects of globalisation rather than its political and economic ones. This, has many important implications as regards its inconsistent antisystemic stand with respect to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as its contradictory domestic economic policies, apart, of course, from the (inevitable for a theocratic regime) irrationalities at the cultural level.
Therefore, the aim of this book, is to draw a clear line from both that of the transnational elite and its acolytes in the reformist Left (who, essentially, adopt the same line on account of the regime’s irrational nature and its violations of human rights etc), as well as from the line of some in the Left, who uncritically support the regime in view of the bigger conflict involved with the transnational elite. In other words, for the Inclusive Democracy (ID) approach, although it is imperative for everybody in the antisystemic Left to support the Islamic regime-- in view of the almost cataclysmic social and political implications at world level which will follow a regime change in Iran imposed by the transnational elite and the Zionists-- we are fully aware that this is just a tactical alliance with a regime which has nothing to do with the ideals of inclusive democracy and autonomy that we support. Yet, the necessary precondition for the road to a genuine democracy to open is the political (and if possible economic) independence of a country from the transnational elite. And it is this very political independence of Iran which is at stake now and not the violation of some human rights by the Islamic regime, as the propaganda of the transnational elite and the Zionists, followed by the reformist Left and a rhetorical anticapitalist Left asserts, disorienting, confusing and in the end, neutralising, thousands of people in the Left all over the world!
1 On the definition of the transnational elite see Takis Fotopoulos, “Globalisation, the reformist Left and the Anti-Globalisation ‘Movement’”, Democracy & Nature, Vol.7, No.2, (July 2001) http://www.democracynature.org/vol7/takis_globalisation.htm
Jump to the next Chapter: The culmination of the campaign for regime change in Iran